Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Blue Owl

(57,894 posts)
43. I was thinking the same goddamned thing
Wed Nov 5, 2025, 07:01 PM
Nov 5

Muskrat and Dump STOLE 2024 from Kamala. Since then they have done nothing to dissuade anyone that they are THIEVES who are willing to steal from the poorest of us so what the fuck would stop these sociopathic psychos???

Recommendations

9 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

My Spidey senses are acting up [View all] Aviation Pro Nov 5 OP
No I think Americans got a wake up call Bluestocking Nov 5 #1
Correct. The facts of 2025 trump the propaganda of 2024. . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Nov 5 #2
This message was self-deleted by its author off-the-clock Thursday #126
Disagree. NoRethugFriends Nov 5 #5
My theory is they don't fuck with the special elections and off-year elections, because yellow dahlia Nov 5 #19
Or did Musk tell dumpie he wasn't going to help him anymore? KS Toronado Nov 5 #40
Another possibility. yellow dahlia Nov 5 #42
Oh absolutely PatSeg Nov 5 #50
We don't get to "rest easy" for awhile. yellow dahlia Nov 5 #63
Yes and once we are back in power, PatSeg Nov 5 #75
Yes! yellow dahlia Nov 5 #77
For sure! Chemical Bill Nov 5 #64
Yes, the whole voter suppression PatSeg Nov 5 #76
This is is why I feel like we have to start today, preparing people to vote Alice B. Thursday #95
Why didn't they fix the Lake/Gallego race in AZ? BannonsLiver Nov 5 #58
Because they had facts this time they didn't have last time. Bernardo de La Paz Thursday #84
Agreed. It was a real confluence of bad stuff Hekate Nov 5 #3
I agree, just like there was in 2020 obamanut2012 Nov 5 #4
And we know they tried. Chemical Bill Nov 5 #65
Here's some data Richluu Nov 5 #6
not really data, but a complicated theory... and if Musk had this magic control LymphocyteLover Friday #148
Honestly I'd point fingers at Texas and Florida for starters. Initech Nov 5 #7
you'd have to be a damn fool to think NJCher Nov 5 #8
"They lost because I wasn't on the ballot" tinrobot Nov 5 #14
Yep Blue_Roses Nov 5 #21
That is my assumption... returnee Thursday #88
Vote tampering ms.pamela Nov 5 #9
I'd like to see voting machines made illegal KS Toronado Nov 5 #56
I agree. but... returnee Thursday #89
That was always obvious. ananda Nov 5 #10
Absolutely Chemical Bill Nov 5 #11
But they just forgot to steal a single race this time? tritsofme Nov 5 #12
It would be hard to cover up in elections of this nature IMHO. n/t rzemanfl Nov 5 #15
Polls showed a close election in New Jersey, Virginia AG race too. Why not steal one? tritsofme Nov 5 #17
Out of 50 states, how many had elections yesterday? rzemanfl Nov 5 #25
33 states had elections yesterday. Wiz Imp Nov 5 #32
Many. There were a lot of local elections. yellow dahlia Nov 5 #33
Why are you asking Democrats? Chemical Bill Nov 5 #30
I'm just asking folks choosing to push ridiculous Trump-style conspiracy theories. tritsofme Nov 5 #36
Yeah, Chemical Bill Nov 5 #66
There were no national elections. hurple Nov 5 #20
So they can steal the presidency but not a Virginia AG race? Pretty lousy supervillains. tritsofme Nov 5 #22
I know, right? It's clear that it's not just MAGAs who are capable of convincing themselves Wiz Imp Nov 5 #27
What's in it for the supervillains to have the AG of Virginia in their camp? rzemanfl Nov 5 #29
The focus on Republicans being massively unpopular losers isn't exactly good for business. tritsofme Nov 5 #35
A Republican AG n Virginia could effectively block a lot of progressive legislation which Wiz Imp Nov 5 #49
I think you are giving this Republican AG magical powers. rzemanfl Nov 5 #71
Yes. That is my theory. yellow dahlia Nov 5 #34
eLoon got what he wanted, no need to help this time ecstatic Thursday #82
Not close enough tintinvotes Thursday #85
Sounds like many have adopted Trump's axiom as their own, that elections are only legitimate when I win. tritsofme Thursday #86
Not worth the risk of detection; plus maintain illusion of democracy. Possible. Nt lostnfound Thursday #122
It's being discussed here, in a public forum. Why would detection be a concern in your conspiracy theory? tritsofme Thursday #125
You misunderstood me and misrepresent my POV in last paragraph "as a vicious attack" lostnfound Friday #135
Don't you hate it when people put words in your mouth? yellow dahlia Friday #141
The judge's ruling in the Rockland County 2024 election fraud case is due before 11/11. in2herbs Nov 5 #13
Mine too, for a different reason. The more it looks like the US is turning on the WH and GOP, the more wiggs Nov 5 #16
Yes Blue_Roses Nov 5 #18
Yep. It was stolen by the muskrat... MaeScott Nov 5 #23
Then why didn't those same people "fuck around with the vote" this year? Wiz Imp Nov 5 #24
How do you know they didn't? Chemical Bill Nov 5 #31
OMG. I can't believe I'm reading such nonsense here. Wiz Imp Nov 5 #44
It's just difficult for me to accept that folks can be that plain stupid. tritsofme Nov 5 #55
I think it comes from people who can't wrap their heads around how much the country had soured on incumbents last year. BannonsLiver Nov 5 #59
there is also a basic inability (unwillingness) for people to admit stopdiggin Thursday #102
Proof of a declaration is immaterial? Chemical Bill Nov 5 #62
Yes. Virtually any declaration issuing forth from THIS individual stopdiggin Thursday #97
It is more difficult to pull off in the off-year and smaller elections, and special elections. yellow dahlia Nov 5 #41
No. Absolutely not. PoindexterOglethorpe Nov 5 #26
Voting machines were compromised. Blue Full Moon Nov 5 #48
I'm sorry, but I'm going with "our elections are honest." PoindexterOglethorpe Nov 5 #54
Have you read The Conyers Report? Chemical Bill Nov 5 #67
I'm with you. A lot! yellow dahlia Nov 5 #28
So elections are only rigged when Democrats lose? Wiz Imp Nov 5 #46
I don't think Dems cheat. And, Trump ALWAYS cheats Joinfortmill Thursday #106
Right. You could begin every sentence with Trump always cheats. yellow dahlia Friday #142
Agree Blue Full Moon Nov 5 #37
I'm persuaded by Greg Palast's work: markodochartaigh Nov 5 #38
Or it could be that voters in these states got a wake up call over the last few months fujiyamasan Nov 5 #39
I was thinking the same goddamned thing Blue Owl Nov 5 #43
Is this being reported by the media? NoNameGranny Nov 5 #45
People where just angry at Trump/ICE/Gop's bs SunImp Nov 5 #47
It's worth pointing out again that 2024 election denialism is actually a vicious attack on Kamala Harris and the entire tritsofme Nov 5 #51
Off year elections would serve as pacification for anyone thinking the general elections contain malware ffr Nov 5 #52
No RandySF Nov 5 #53
Harris won. End of story. Botany Nov 5 #57
There definitely were massive voter suppression efforts, massive propaganda operations LymphocyteLover Nov 5 #61
The vote flipping and deletions was done not at the precinct levels of which you are right would be unwork-... Botany Nov 5 #70
you don't think anyone in the secretary of Dem state offices of Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania LymphocyteLover Nov 5 #74
Good questions, Botany Thursday #91
couldn't that surge just be actual voters (since more Repubs tend to vote on election day)? LymphocyteLover Friday #132
A large surge of red voters from a large strongly blue voting population @ the last minute? Please. Botany Friday #134
All the obvious anecdotes match up to all the simple math. yellow dahlia Friday #143
A simple bell shaped curve for statical analysis will easily show causality behind the election results. Botany Saturday #150
There you go! Seems simple when you look at the mathematical models. yellow dahlia Saturday #152
please provide a specific example of that kind of red surge in a blue area LymphocyteLover Friday #147
You think someone from the sos office at the state level looks at every precinct result to see if it matches? questionseverything Thursday #120
No, but wouldn't someone at the county level do that? Or are they in on the plot? LymphocyteLover Friday #131
I sorry. But it NEVER happened. stopdiggin Thursday #98
I hear you... Chemical Bill Nov 5 #69
Musk had the technology. yellow dahlia Nov 5 #79
this is repeated by a lot of people that have no idea what the 'technology' is stopdiggin Thursday #103
. Chemical Bill Thursday #112
are you offering this as some species of 'evidence'? stopdiggin Thursday #119
Perhaps you stopped reading... Chemical Bill Thursday #123
Yawn. It really isn't worth my good time. (while repeating, "this is evidence ..?" ) - -(nt)- stopdiggin Thursday #124
Interesting. Chemical Bill Friday #140
Any election Democrats lose is rigged. iemanja Nov 5 #60
Pretty tiring isn't it? fujiyamasan Thursday #83
it's just plain sad. !!! - -(nt)- stopdiggin Thursday #100
. Chemical Bill Thursday #116
I dunno Cirsium Nov 5 #68
Agree. MorbidButterflyTat Nov 5 #72
They will intensify efforts to disenfranchise... WestMichRad Nov 5 #73
In '26, and '28 we need the brightest, wileyest White Hat Hackers keeping all eyes on the votes & totals, tabulaters etc electric_blue68 Nov 5 #78
Yes. yellow dahlia Thursday #111
my theory AncientOfDays Thursday #80
Exactly. yellow dahlia Thursday #113
DITTO!! BadGimp Thursday #81
They've proved it already but have trouble selling it SupportSanity Thursday #87
My gut's about the same Torchlight Thursday #90
Based on what? themaguffin Thursday #92
The economy is being wrecked, people feel it. BlueTsunami2018 Thursday #93
Why didn't fElon help this time? Clouds Passing Thursday #94
I don't think so. It just took a year or two of Trump in full swing to get out the vote, and persuade even many Martin68 Thursday #96
I'm sorry - but it NEVER happened. And your twitchy 'senses' are leading you astray. stopdiggin Thursday #99
I thought so too. I felt that way after Pennsylvania and Michigan went to Trump. It doesn't make sense. OLDMDDEM Thursday #101
Like in 2024 obnoxiousdrunk Thursday #104
Yup. Joinfortmill Thursday #105
Same thing happened 8 years ago krawhitham Thursday #107
And then they forget how bad he is? n/t Chemical Bill Friday #130
Eforensic analysis says something aint right angryxyouth Thursday #108
So since this is all so clearly documented and proven, you must be accusing Kamala of knowing tritsofme Thursday #117
Yes I am angryxyouth Friday #136
At least you're honest, this contempt and hatred for Harris and Democrats appears widespread among election deniers tritsofme Friday #137
Sometimes the truth hurts angryxyouth Monday #153
Yes. "They" use Russian-type psy-ops to convince people not to question elections, yellow dahlia Friday #144
Don't worry. Most of us realize that this is in NO way an attack on Dems. yellow dahlia Thursday #121
It is absolutely a vicious attack on Democrats. You must believe truly terrible things about Kamala Harris and Democrats tritsofme Friday #133
The problem is the premise is flawed fujiyamasan Friday #145
Interestingly... Chemical Bill Friday #146
That's one way to look at it, and I believe it to be true jmowreader Thursday #109
Right. The analysis is easy. yellow dahlia Thursday #114
Wonder why trump and Elon didn't hack Tuesday's election? Silent Type Thursday #110
Not worth it jmowreader Thursday #115
Didn't happen in 2024 either. We lost. Was hoping Conspiracy Theories would stop, but nope. Silent Type Thursday #118
Exactly. Analysis needs to be applied to the circumstances at the moment. yellow dahlia Friday #138
I absolutely think that 2024 was stolen Metaphorical Thursday #127
So simple and so obvious. yellow dahlia Friday #139
Republicans are saying the same thing about Tuesday Polybius Friday #128
you'd be surprised just how much sexism / racism played into it Skittles Friday #129
Does that same logic apply to the 2010 elections? EdmondDantes_ Friday #149
Alot! Clouds Passing Saturday #151
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»My Spidey senses are acti...»Reply #43