Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

karynnj

(60,672 posts)
8. The risk here is that it will resurrect the real Russia story
Thu Nov 6, 2025, 11:24 AM
Thursday

Mueller actually indicted several people, who took a plea or were found guilty including Manaford. Even though hidden by Barr's lies, the conclusion seemed to be there was ample evidence that Russia did interfere against HRC for Trump, but it was not clear they had enough proof that Trump colluded. (Note the latter was when he was President - so it is a pretty damning report, much of which was not made public.)

For Brennan in 2016, it would have been negligent to NOT pursue foreign interference. Not to mention, the Obama administration tried to make a bipartisan joint statement on intelligence with the Republicans, but McConnell refused. The statement put out before the election carefully limited itself to Russian interference, not collusion with Trump and his campaign.

If anything, a case could be made that the Obama administration was extremely careful in not accusing Trump before the election. This even as Manford was doing some pretty suspicious stuff. The campaign also was involved with Cambridge Analytics using Facebook data and some of that data was rumored to have sent to Russia. If so, that data may have helped the troll farm target people on Facebook with lies.

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»MSNBC has a story that DO...»Reply #8