Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Prairie Gates

(6,823 posts)
6. Nope: in house prosecutions
Fri Nov 7, 2025, 12:00 PM
Nov 7

1. Any ICE agent who acted illegally under the color of law.
2. Any federal employee or agency head who broke the law
3. Any official who took any kind of prohibited bribe, gift, or donation whatsoever.
4. Any official who broke or directed others to break the Hatch Act by illegally using a federal agency for the purpose of political advocacy.

Put them all in the federal penitentiary.

This should be a top-level item in the Dem platform.

Recommendations

8 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Looking toward a future without criminals in our highest office UpInArms Nov 7 #1
It's called foresight orangecrush Nov 7 #2
At least someone has some foresight PatSeg Nov 7 #25
Perhaps there is communicatiom that would make bribery charges easy to stick since this is before hand and not a "tip" JT45242 Nov 7 #3
Imagine how many Special Prosecutors the next DOJ will have to appoint. sop Nov 7 #4
Nope: in house prosecutions Prairie Gates Nov 7 #6
Trump's going to need about a hundred Autopen machines to sign all the pardons. sop Nov 7 #10
I like it orangecrush Nov 7 #12
Maybe they can contribute to rebuilding the East wing when this Nazi shit is over Blues Heron Nov 7 #5
Good idea orangecrush Nov 7 #13
Finally. They have figured out that there will be life after Trump. Baitball Blogger Nov 7 #7
My take as well. orangecrush Nov 7 #14
Profile in courage, that one. Scrivener7 Nov 7 #8
YNS... 2naSalit Nov 7 #9
Or the Dark Lard-Ass's colon n/t BaronChocula Nov 7 #16
To be fair... 2naSalit Nov 7 #17
So technically BaronChocula Nov 7 #18
Indeed... 2naSalit Nov 7 #19
That last line gives me a modicum of hope Roxi Nov 7 #11
That is the way most banks should be. I know when I worked for the Bank in Canada, all banks would Bev54 Nov 7 #15
Hilarious D_Master81 Nov 7 #20
18 U.S. Code § 201 Bluetus Nov 7 #21
Chase has standards??? xuplate Nov 7 #22
A 2028 Democratic Triumvirate 3825-87867 Nov 7 #23
Whoa Looking Ahead! TY! Cha Nov 7 #24
Bribery and extortion will look bad in daylight rurallib Nov 7 #26
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Dimon on JPMorgan Chase n...»Reply #6