Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Celerity

(53,023 posts)
111. Canary Mission: Trump officials used shadowy website to target pro-Palestinian academics for deportation, court
Sat Nov 8, 2025, 06:10 PM
Saturday
records show

The unsealed court records also reveal how deeply involved Trump aide Stephen Miller was in the effort to revoke the visas of pro-Palestinian academics.

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/07/09/pro-palestinian-deportation-documents-trial-00445238

As the Trump administration identified pro-Palestinian academics to target for deportation, it relied heavily on an anonymously-run pro-Israel website that has been criticized for doxxing, according to newly unsealed court documents and testimony at an ongoing trial.

To support President Donald Trump’s deportation drive, the Department of Homeland Security assembled a “tiger team” of intelligence analysts who built dossiers on about 100 foreign students and scholars engaged in pro-Palestinian activity, the records show.

More than 75 of those people were identified by the shadowy website Canary Mission, according to deposition testimony unveiled this week in a case challenging the Trump administration’s targeting of pro-Palestinian scholars.

The federal judge currently overseeing a trial in the case unsealed the deposition transcripts, which contain hundreds of pages of sworn testimony by administration officials about the campus deportation effort. Some of the details in the transcripts were fleshed out in open court Wednesday as administration officials began to be called to the witness stand.

snip


Canary Mission

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canary_Mission

Canary Mission is an anonymously run doxing[1][2] website established in 2014 that smears[2] and publishes the personal information of students, professors, and organizations that it describes as anti-Israel or antisemitic, focusing primarily on people at North American universities.[3][4][5] Critics have described it as weaponizing the accusation of antisemitism in order to silence critique of Israel.[1]

Canary Mission's published materials have been described as a blacklist.[6][7] Profiles are publicly-available online and intended for wide use, and Canary Mission may actively send them to employers.[8] Known users of the profiles include Israeli intelligence organizations Ministry of Strategic Affairs[1][9][10] and Shin Bet,[1] which interrogate and deny entry to American citizens.[10][11][12] In March 2025, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement and other US federal agents detained and attempted to deport multiple international students with Canary Mission profiles.[13] Canary Mission's work is controversial.[6][14][7] Its tactics have been compared to McCarthyism[15][5] and the makeup and reliability of its profiles have been questioned.

Collaboration with government authorities

Allegations have been made that Israeli intelligence organizations, such as the Shin Bet, use Canary Mission profiles.[1] The Ministry of Strategic Affairs[1][16][10] used a Canary Mission profile during the attempted deportation proceedings against Lara Alqasem.[17] The Israeli government has been accused of using Canary Mission data at border control.[18][10][19][12] In March 2025, multiple foreign students with Canary Mission profiles were detained by the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement for allegations of supporting terror.[13] Canary Mission has also been accused of working with the FBI.[20]

2025 federal trial admission

In July 2025, a senior official from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) testified in a federal trial that his team used Canary Mission as a source to investigate a number of student protesters that were foreign nationals.[21] Court records from a federal lawsuit revealed that senior Trump administration officials relied heavily on Canary Mission, in order to identify foreign students and academics who violated the terms of their visa.[22][23][24]

snip




Dear Legal Community,

It is my goal that Berkeley Law be an environment where all ideas and views can be expressed. This includes speech on controversial issues and even expression that might offend others. I want to do all I can to facilitate and protect that speech. I therefore have been very upset to see that some of our students have been threatened and harassed because they chose to exercise their First Amendment rights.

Some of our students, particularly those supporting the Law Students for Justice in Palestine, have been targeted by Canary Mission. Canary Mission is an extremist website that declares that its purpose is to document “people and groups that promote hatred of the USA, Israel and Jews.” The website does this by publicizing the names, pictures, social media accounts, and other personal information of those whose views it disagrees with it. It says that its intent is keeping “today’s radicals from becoming tomorrow’s employees.”

I condemn this targeting of particular students because of their speech with the goal of harming their employment opportunities. It has caused great injury to our students and our community. This targeting of students because of their views undermines our desire to be a place where difficult issues can be debated and where students feel comfortable taking political positions. Students have reported removing particular experiences from their resumes and refusing to participate in groups and/or events that they would otherwise be interested in because of Canary Mission’s targeted attempt to affect their employment outcomes.

Although I may disagree with some of my students’ views on specific issues, it is my firm belief that the Canary Mission website should not be used as a resource to evaluate students’ qualifications for hiring. If Berkeley Law students are barred from employment opportunities for exercising their First Amendment rights, it will have the grave effect of chilling speech and stifling the exchange of ideas on campus.

Sincerely,

Erwin Chemerinsky
Dean and Jesse H. Choper Distinguished Professor of Law
University of California, Berkeley School of Law




Jewish students: A blacklist of BDS supporters is hurting our efforts to defend Israel on campus

Canary Mission is making it easier for BDS-affiliated legislation to pass, write student activists from across the country.


https://www.jta.org/2018/04/23/ideas/jewish-students-blacklist-bds-supporters-hurting-efforts-defend-israel-campus

(JTA) — We are Jewish and pro-Israel students who are active within our Jewish communities on college campuses across North America. Many of us have helped organize against the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions-affiliated movements throughout our time on campus.

Over the course of our time fighting BDS campaigns, Canary Mission was brought to our attention repeatedly. Canary Mission is an anonymous site that blacklists individuals and professors across the country for their support of the BDS movement, presumed anti-Semitic remarks and hateful rhetoric against Israel and the United States.

As a group of conscientious students on the front lines fighting BDS on our campuses, we are compelled to speak out against this website because it uses intimidation tactics, is antithetical to our democratic and Jewish values, is counterproductive to our efforts and is morally reprehensible.

snip

However, we believe that promoting a negative perception of Muslims, particularly Muslim students on our campuses, as Canary Mission does, is similarly hateful. As students on the front lines, we hope that Jewish and pro-Israel communal organizations will trust us and work more collaboratively with us to handle this fight in a credible, respectful and moral manner among our student communities. We believe that Canary Mission is antithetical and destructive to our shared cause of supporting Israel and eliminating anti-Semitism on campus. Instead, we expect credible Jewish and pro-Israel communal organizations to help us combat anti-Semitism on college campuses, and around the world, in a diplomatic manner that seeks to protect our community rather than shaming the other side anonymously, as Canary Mission does.

snip

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Seems reasonable to me. yardwork Saturday #1
Yes, I saw it as a way of saying thank you. ananda Saturday #97
Nothing wrong with that SocialDemocrat61 Saturday #2
Our two party system is a barrier in so many ways. yardwork Saturday #6
It really isn't. W_HAMILTON Saturday #27
They align with Dems edhopper Saturday #44
And therefore Mamdani voting Democratic would not have impacted them much... W_HAMILTON Saturday #56
The WFPis not divisive edhopper Saturday #58
Again, I'm not criticizing WFP here -- I'm criticizing Mamdani's response to a loaded question. W_HAMILTON Saturday #68
I see. edhopper Saturday #86
More parties might lead to more pressure to BlueKota Saturday #30
The requirement to hold informal coalitions together is a huge flaw thought crime Sunday #118
Yes I usually WFP on next office down. IbogaProject Saturday #34
If it were against Andrew Cuomo SocialDemocrat61 Saturday #40
So what? NoRethugFriends Saturday #3
Don't care. Happy Hoosier Saturday #4
This was one of his first tests as mayor-elect and he did not pass. W_HAMILTON Saturday #46
I think you're reading way too much into this. yardwork Saturday #98
Feel free to bookmark my post and check back around this time next year. W_HAMILTON Saturday #109
Glad he won, but just as much as it pisses me off that so many Democratic leaders didn't endorse him or Scrivener7 Saturday #5
I disagree. yardwork Saturday #9
The disloyalty of "leave it blank" was a big consideration for some who delayed or who gave a perfunctory endorsement. QueerDuck Saturday #15
Schumer should have SocialDemocrat61 Saturday #26
Mamdani did not get President Obama's endorsement. lapucelle Saturday #43
Looks like Obama made the right decision after this report about Mamdani. W_HAMILTON Saturday #47
I thought he was smart enough to follow the AOC path, the one leading to a future in politics. betsuni Saturday #80
AOC seemed to learn relatively early on that you have to work with others to accomplish anything in a democracy. W_HAMILTON Saturday #87
Has Obama endorsed a candidate before? SocialDemocrat61 Saturday #49
Yes. President Obama endorsed Bill de Blasio in 2013 and Bill Thompson in 2009. lapucelle Saturday #63
When was President SocialDemocrat61 Saturday #69
You asked whether Obama has ever endorsed a NYC mayoral candidate "before". The answer is "yes". lapucelle Saturday #76
Yes he did SocialDemocrat61 Saturday #81
Obama has integrity. He's an honorable man... QueerDuck Saturday #95
If ANY Democratic leader is directly asked what they think of ANY Democratic primary winner, the endorsement should be Scrivener7 Saturday #71
Does that include Tom Suozzi SocialDemocrat61 Saturday #73
After their next primary, if the Democratic voters in their district have spoken and chosen them? Yes it does. Scrivener7 Saturday #75
No but this is SocialDemocrat61 Saturday #77
Yes. He was. And as I said, I don't like him not voting in the Dem line. Scrivener7 Saturday #78
Cool SocialDemocrat61 Saturday #83
That's nice. Scrivener7 Saturday #84
Thanks SocialDemocrat61 Saturday #88
OMG how dare he!!!! JonAndKatePlusABird Saturday #7
OK markodochartaigh Saturday #8
I was a huge fan of Mario Cuomo BlueKota Saturday #35
If markodochartaigh Saturday #89
No he did not. BlueKota Saturday #99
I think he forgot the sarcasm tag IbogaProject Saturday #36
And............? Nanjeanne Saturday #10
Freedom for supporters of the government only, for members of one party only Ping Tung Saturday #11
Hasn't Bernie been doing this for years? nt Wounded Bear Saturday #12
Sanders runs in the primary unopposed as a Democrat and then declines the nomination. lapucelle Saturday #14
Gaming the system? Or a middle finger to the party? QueerDuck Saturday #16
Whatever. The people in his state seem to be OK with it... Wounded Bear Saturday #17
This message was self-deleted by its author QueerDuck Saturday #18
For now, yes. But I think it sets a bad example and only serves to weaken the party in the long run. QueerDuck Saturday #19
If there is one lesson we need to take from Tuesday's victories... Wounded Bear Saturday #23
National politics are not local. Third parties are spoilers that weaken and divide and benefit the GOP. QueerDuck Saturday #31
Didn't even have to look to figure out this one's favorite group NoRethugFriends Saturday #72
Seriously?? Why the contempt for the Democratic party? He used the party machinery to run for office... QueerDuck Saturday #13
The WFP edhopper Saturday #21
Oh brother... the "would you rather" type of evasive response generally indicates a position of weakness... QueerDuck Saturday #29
No edhopper Saturday #38
Unless, of course, they accidently run Republicans in general elections. lapucelle Saturday #52
No. What they are saying is "the Democrats are not worth your vote." It depresses turnout and... QueerDuck Saturday #53
You are wrong edhopper Saturday #59
What contempt? Can you show me the contempt on this doll? Is the contempt in the room with us right now? Iggo Saturday #66
HA! 🤣😂🤪 QueerDuck Saturday #70
I also voted for him edhopper Saturday #20
Last year the NYS WFP accidently nominated a Republican spoiler lapucelle Saturday #23
accidently edhopper Saturday #41
So folks need to be careful who they vote for on the WFP's ballot line. lapucelle Saturday #45
A lot of assumbtions there edhopper Saturday #50
What assumptions are there? lapucelle Saturday #57
If the vote does not benefit the Democrat, then it benefits the Republican. QueerDuck Saturday #110
The WFP did not nominate Frascone Quiet Em Saturday #96
Republican Francone was the WFP nominee in the 2024 general election. That's a simple fact. lapucelle Saturday #103
The Republicans gamed the system. I'll agree with that. Quiet Em Saturday #108
NYWFP puts in a lot of the ground work to get Democrats elected in New York State Quiet Em Saturday #22
I'm a DNC member in NYS. I know all about the Working Family Party and what they do lapucelle Saturday #37
Do you think they did more to get Mamdani elected than actual Democrats? W_HAMILTON Saturday #39
I think they play a role in helping elect Democrats in NYS. Quiet Em Saturday #48
I don't fault WFP for what they did -- I fault Mamdani for what he did, or at least his answer to the question. W_HAMILTON Saturday #54
I don't know. Quiet Em Saturday #62
please notice that politico says it was stated by Mamdani's campaign niyad Saturday #92
I do know that. And that is the same as coming from Mamdani himself. Hence "spokesman." W_HAMILTON Saturday #93
Since it is politico, I would want to hear from Mayor-elect Mamdani himself. niyad Saturday #94
So he'd be in violation of TOS if he tried to post here Shrek Saturday #25
How would he be in violation? niyad Saturday #28
Members are required to support Democrats Shrek Saturday #32
And again, I say how? He is not attacking Democrats. niyad Saturday #42
How? Emile Saturday #33
"not a good look" this is a message board my dude WhiskeyGrinder Saturday #60
I don't think that's loyal enough to our party gulliver Saturday #51
So, How Does Anyone Know That? MineralMan Saturday #55
Politico's Albany reporter attributes the information to a Mamdani campaign spokesperson. lapucelle Saturday #74
It's a thing in NY that people who support the WFP vote on that line because if they Raftergirl Saturday #61
I'm well aware of the WFP machinations in NYS. They ran "Leave It Blank" in the Democratic presidential primary in 2024. lapucelle Saturday #90
Wow, what a surprise. Nixie Saturday #64
Yep...don't care. Iggo Saturday #65
We also have a Conservative Party in NY and every R is also cross endorsed with them. So some people choose Raftergirl Saturday #67
The Conservative Party did not cross-endorse the Republican candidate for mayor in 2025. lapucelle Saturday #91
Not always cross endorsed but often. All the R's in my town election were crossed endorsed by Conservative Party. Raftergirl Saturday #100
So it is not true that "every R is also cross endorsed with [the Consevative Party candidate], lapucelle Saturday #104
Ok. Most R's are cross endorsed. Better? Raftergirl Saturday #105
Absolutely better. It's important to keep track of what third parties are actually up to, lapucelle Saturday #107
I voted all on third party in my county here Historic NY Saturday #79
Innnteresting. Seems like this thread did what it was intended to do. Scrivener7 Saturday #82
ADL creates new 'Mamdani Monitor' project to track his administration policies Ping Tung Saturday #85
Under the guise of fighting hate speech, the ADL has a long history of attacking Arab, Black, and queer people. Celerity Saturday #101
Agreed. And, they're making very little effort to hide their own bigotry. Ping Tung Saturday #102
Fuck terrorist-adjacent Emmaia Gelman and her anti-ADL screed. lapucelle Saturday #106
Canary Mission: Trump officials used shadowy website to target pro-Palestinian academics for deportation, court Celerity Saturday #111
It's a disgusting very unAmerican McCarthyite Hate Site vanessa_ca Saturday #112
Yes, it is dismaying to see it pushed here. Celerity Saturday #113
The vile celebration of the October 7 slaughter comes staight from vile terrorist-adjacent Emmaia Gelman's Instagram lapucelle Saturday #116
I don't care one way or the other but I bet that is bullshit. Demsrule86 Saturday #114
NYS has a fusion voting system. A candidate can appear on more than one ballot line. lapucelle Saturday #117
Don't care orangecrush Saturday #115
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Zohran Mandani did not vo...»Reply #111