Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why Does Schumer Keep Trying to Cave? [View all]Celerity
(53,087 posts)10. the article discusses that
At Thursdays meeting, they told their caucus colleagues that they now had ten votes to re-open the government in exchange for no real Republican concessions. At that, much of the rest of the caucus went ballistic, and some of the supposed ten said that, in fact, they were not willing to vote for any such deal. The leaders of the proposed Democratic cave-in, Sens. Maggie Hassan and Jeanne Shaheen, both of New Hampshire, and Catherine Cortez Masto of Nevada, then backed down.
Only after that did Schumer go public with his proposal to reopen the government in exchange for a one-year extension of the ACA subsidies, along with a bipartisan commission to figure out a long-term solution. Republican Senate Leader John Thune (R-SD), who had been led to expect a Democratic capitulation, first accused Schumer of browbeating his colleagues but then said later Saturday that talks were continuing.
President Trump, meanwhile, who had urged the Senate to stay in weekend session to reach a deal, reverted to his usual rants on Truth Social Saturday morning, declaring: I am recommending to Senate Republicans that the Hundreds of Billions of Dollars currently being sent to money sucking Insurance Companies in order to save the bad Healthcare provided by ObamaCare, BE SENT DIRECTLY TO THE PEOPLE SO THAT THEY CAN PURCHASE THEIR OWN, MUCH BETTER, HEALTHCARE, and have money left over. He also called once again for an end of the filibuster.
Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-LA), chair of the committee with jurisdiction over health care, pitched a related scheme that would turn the enhanced ACA subsidies into a flexible spending account, which would likely push people into high-deductible plans and complicate the maddening health care system even further. Informed observers tell me that the obvious compromise deal, which would allow each side to claim a partial victory, is either a shorter extension of the ACA subsidies for less than a year, or an extention with a partial cut at higher incomes. It remains to be seen whether both sides can get to yes.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
60 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
B/c he is never punished for his failures and capitulations with a loss of position.
RockRaven
Nov 8
#1
5 yrs of pachyderm filbusters and then he changed the rules 2013 5th yr of Obama's presidency.
GreenWave
Sunday
#53
He wants a deal , even a bad deal to pretend that he still knows what he's doing
Bread and Circuses
Nov 8
#4
There's talk from House reps that he's more concerned for the airline industry that are screaming to end the shutdown
pecosbob
Nov 8
#6
This propaganda piece from the left damn near has me breaking my pledge to never link to a certain website.
W_HAMILTON
Nov 8
#8
The article is a biased piece of shit. It was not a negotiated deal by Democrats, much less Schumer.
W_HAMILTON
Nov 8
#11
disagree with your framing attempts, as it was a group of centrist Dems who floated the idea (most Dems said NO) to
Celerity
Nov 8
#12
WRONG. And the article is outdated, but since we are linking the previously referenced fascist friendly outlet:
W_HAMILTON
Sunday
#44
Good fuckin question!! We're FINALLY startin to win again and Schumer is lookin to capitulate?? HELL NO!!!
InAbLuEsTaTe
Nov 8
#13
The assignment is to put "cave" in as many headlines about Democrats, especially Schumer, as possible.
betsuni
Nov 8
#20
Did you read that article? Because even it directly refutes the bullshit article in the OP.
W_HAMILTON
Sunday
#47
I've seen posts on DU where people seem to have this fantasy that we can keep the government shut down for several more
Midwestern Democrat
Sunday
#45