Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Celerity

(53,087 posts)
10. the article discusses that
Sat Nov 8, 2025, 09:17 PM
Nov 8

At Thursday’s meeting, they told their caucus colleagues that they now had ten votes to re-open the government in exchange for no real Republican concessions. At that, much of the rest of the caucus went ballistic, and some of the supposed ten said that, in fact, they were not willing to vote for any such deal. The leaders of the proposed Democratic cave-in, Sens. Maggie Hassan and Jeanne Shaheen, both of New Hampshire, and Catherine Cortez Masto of Nevada, then backed down.

Only after that did Schumer go public with his proposal to reopen the government in exchange for a one-year extension of the ACA subsidies, along with a bipartisan commission to figure out a long-term solution. Republican Senate Leader John Thune (R-SD), who had been led to expect a Democratic capitulation, first accused Schumer of “browbeating” his colleagues but then said later Saturday that talks were continuing.


President Trump, meanwhile, who had urged the Senate to stay in weekend session to reach a deal, reverted to his usual rants on Truth Social Saturday morning, declaring: “I am recommending to Senate Republicans that the Hundreds of Billions of Dollars currently being sent to money sucking Insurance Companies in order to save the bad Healthcare provided by ObamaCare, BE SENT DIRECTLY TO THE PEOPLE SO THAT THEY CAN PURCHASE THEIR OWN, MUCH BETTER, HEALTHCARE, and have money left over.” He also called once again for an end of the filibuster.

Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-LA), chair of the committee with jurisdiction over health care, pitched a related scheme that would turn the enhanced ACA subsidies into a flexible spending account, which would likely push people into high-deductible plans and complicate the maddening health care system even further. Informed observers tell me that the obvious compromise deal, which would allow each side to claim a partial victory, is either a shorter extension of the ACA subsidies for less than a year, or an extention with a partial cut at higher incomes. It remains to be seen whether both sides can get to yes.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

B/c he is never punished for his failures and capitulations with a loss of position. RockRaven Nov 8 #1
Democrat Who Caved on Shutdown Says Chuck Schumer Knew All Along Celerity Monday #60
Because he's weak. Chuck is no Harry Reid Historic NY Nov 8 #2
Reid caved to Mitch and we did not get legislation through. GreenWave Sunday #38
Reid got Obamacare ACA through Historic NY Sunday #40
5 yrs of pachyderm filbusters and then he changed the rules 2013 5th yr of Obama's presidency. GreenWave Sunday #53
Well that is certainly a creative re-write of history. tritsofme Sunday #42
60 votes or bust was in vogue too long. GreenWave Sunday #52
I don't know what that is supposed to mean. tritsofme Sunday #55
Schumer is not the leader for this moment. yellow dahlia Nov 8 #3
He wants a deal , even a bad deal to pretend that he still knows what he's doing Bread and Circuses Nov 8 #4
... orangecrush Nov 8 #5
There's talk from House reps that he's more concerned for the airline industry that are screaming to end the shutdown pecosbob Nov 8 #6
Maybe contributions are down. AltairIV Sunday #56
This message was self-deleted by its author dalton99a Nov 8 #7
This propaganda piece from the left damn near has me breaking my pledge to never link to a certain website. W_HAMILTON Nov 8 #8
the article discusses that Celerity Nov 8 #10
The article is a biased piece of shit. It was not a negotiated deal by Democrats, much less Schumer. W_HAMILTON Nov 8 #11
disagree with your framing attempts, as it was a group of centrist Dems who floated the idea (most Dems said NO) to Celerity Nov 8 #12
WRONG. And the article is outdated, but since we are linking the previously referenced fascist friendly outlet: W_HAMILTON Sunday #44
Message auto-removed Name removed Sunday #59
TY.. it is a really sad shame. Cha Nov 8 #17
So damn tiring. MorbidButterflyTat Sunday #49
I really Appreciate your Cha Sunday #57
Why does this surprise anyone? gab13by13 Nov 8 #9
Good fuckin question!! We're FINALLY startin to win again and Schumer is lookin to capitulate?? HELL NO!!! InAbLuEsTaTe Nov 8 #13
he needs to follow Pelosi's lead Skittles Nov 8 #14
Post removed Post removed Nov 8 #15
No Sen Schumer is Not that at All. Cha Nov 8 #18
We'll have to agree to disagree. Grim Chieftain Nov 8 #19
Why should I believe a word of this? Wiz Imp Nov 8 #16
The assignment is to put "cave" in as many headlines about Democrats, especially Schumer, as possible. betsuni Nov 8 #20
lol Cha Nov 8 #21
Because the American Prospect has a high Factual and Credibility rating. Emile Sunday #22
No... it also says they have a LEFT BIAS. QueerDuck Sunday #25
I don't post links to right-wing bias publications. Emile Sunday #27
Nobody said otherwise. QueerDuck Sunday #31
Good to know. I hate to think a left-wing bias publication Emile Sunday #32
You're welcome. QueerDuck Sunday #33
Your very oddly edited first paragraph is extremely misleading, at best. sl8 Sunday #29
Thanks for the update. QueerDuck Sunday #30
Why? Because you left out the "may", which made your claim untrue muriel_volestrangler Sunday #54
Their anti-Dem agenda is obvious. Many things are obvious about this thread... QueerDuck Sunday #23
CNN reported on the same story too. Emile Sunday #24
No that's not the same story. Please. QueerDuck Sunday #26
Did you read that article? Because even it directly refutes the bullshit article in the OP. W_HAMILTON Sunday #47
THANK YOU MorbidButterflyTat Sunday #50
Mahalo For Explaining! I Know It's Cha Sunday #58
Last Tuesday screamed the following message, gab13by13 Sunday #28
Unless I misunderstood the deal TheFarseer Sunday #34
"Capitulation in exchange for nothing." Paladin Sunday #35
Long past time for Chuck to pass the baton johnnyfins Sunday #36
Good article, thanks for posting SocialDemocrat61 Sunday #37
"The sort of players who would fold a royal flush." Kid Berwyn Sunday #39
Useless VanceFan Sunday #41
Because millions of US citizens are starting to starve? krawhitham Sunday #43
I've seen posts on DU where people seem to have this fantasy that we can keep the government shut down for several more Midwestern Democrat Sunday #45
Excuse me, it's the majority party that shut down Emile Sunday #48
He is a member of the democrat's old guard. republianmushroom Sunday #46
Post removed Post removed Sunday #51
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why Does Schumer Keep Try...»Reply #10