General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why Does Schumer Keep Trying to Cave? [View all]QueerDuck
(609 posts)It also says they "... utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy."
If anyone wants to use the "appeal to authority" fallacy, let's at least be fully honest and transparent, and provide a complete picture of the evaluation... warts and all. Nobody is perfect.
The MBFC is not the be-all/end-all arbiter of all things true or all things false. They put together an overall picture of a website or outlet's overall reputation (and even THAT is subjective and opinion.) But even taking that into consideration, it's fair to ask why this org is one click above "mostly factual" ... they fail to achieve the highest rating. Why? Because they are flawed, just like anyone else... and anti-Dem agenda-driven BS like the one featured here is the reason why.
Also, opinion pieces are just that... OPINIONS. This is not a news story, it's an editorial, a hit-piece that's presented as "news".