Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TheFarseer

(9,717 posts)
34. Unless I misunderstood the deal
Sun Nov 9, 2025, 08:25 AM
Sunday

It sounds pretty reasonable. Reopen the government and extend subsidies for one year in the same vote. Why is that caving?

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

B/c he is never punished for his failures and capitulations with a loss of position. RockRaven Saturday #1
Democrat Who Caved on Shutdown Says Chuck Schumer Knew All Along Celerity Monday #60
Because he's weak. Chuck is no Harry Reid Historic NY Saturday #2
Reid caved to Mitch and we did not get legislation through. GreenWave Sunday #38
Reid got Obamacare ACA through Historic NY Sunday #40
5 yrs of pachyderm filbusters and then he changed the rules 2013 5th yr of Obama's presidency. GreenWave Sunday #53
Well that is certainly a creative re-write of history. tritsofme Sunday #42
60 votes or bust was in vogue too long. GreenWave Sunday #52
I don't know what that is supposed to mean. tritsofme Sunday #55
Schumer is not the leader for this moment. yellow dahlia Saturday #3
He wants a deal , even a bad deal to pretend that he still knows what he's doing Bread and Circuses Saturday #4
... orangecrush Saturday #5
There's talk from House reps that he's more concerned for the airline industry that are screaming to end the shutdown pecosbob Saturday #6
Maybe contributions are down. AltairIV Sunday #56
This message was self-deleted by its author dalton99a Saturday #7
This propaganda piece from the left damn near has me breaking my pledge to never link to a certain website. W_HAMILTON Saturday #8
the article discusses that Celerity Saturday #10
The article is a biased piece of shit. It was not a negotiated deal by Democrats, much less Schumer. W_HAMILTON Saturday #11
disagree with your framing attempts, as it was a group of centrist Dems who floated the idea (most Dems said NO) to Celerity Saturday #12
WRONG. And the article is outdated, but since we are linking the previously referenced fascist friendly outlet: W_HAMILTON Sunday #44
Message auto-removed Name removed Sunday #59
TY.. it is a really sad shame. Cha Saturday #17
So damn tiring. MorbidButterflyTat Sunday #49
I really Appreciate your Cha Sunday #57
Why does this surprise anyone? gab13by13 Saturday #9
Good fuckin question!! We're FINALLY startin to win again and Schumer is lookin to capitulate?? HELL NO!!! InAbLuEsTaTe Saturday #13
he needs to follow Pelosi's lead Skittles Saturday #14
Post removed Post removed Saturday #15
No Sen Schumer is Not that at All. Cha Saturday #18
We'll have to agree to disagree. Grim Chieftain Saturday #19
Why should I believe a word of this? Wiz Imp Saturday #16
The assignment is to put "cave" in as many headlines about Democrats, especially Schumer, as possible. betsuni Saturday #20
lol Cha Saturday #21
Because the American Prospect has a high Factual and Credibility rating. Emile Sunday #22
No... it also says they have a LEFT BIAS. QueerDuck Sunday #25
I don't post links to right-wing bias publications. Emile Sunday #27
Nobody said otherwise. QueerDuck Sunday #31
Good to know. I hate to think a left-wing bias publication Emile Sunday #32
You're welcome. QueerDuck Sunday #33
Your very oddly edited first paragraph is extremely misleading, at best. sl8 Sunday #29
Thanks for the update. QueerDuck Sunday #30
Why? Because you left out the "may", which made your claim untrue muriel_volestrangler Sunday #54
Their anti-Dem agenda is obvious. Many things are obvious about this thread... QueerDuck Sunday #23
CNN reported on the same story too. Emile Sunday #24
No that's not the same story. Please. QueerDuck Sunday #26
Did you read that article? Because even it directly refutes the bullshit article in the OP. W_HAMILTON Sunday #47
THANK YOU MorbidButterflyTat Sunday #50
Mahalo For Explaining! I Know It's Cha Sunday #58
Last Tuesday screamed the following message, gab13by13 Sunday #28
Unless I misunderstood the deal TheFarseer Sunday #34
"Capitulation in exchange for nothing." Paladin Sunday #35
Long past time for Chuck to pass the baton johnnyfins Sunday #36
Good article, thanks for posting SocialDemocrat61 Sunday #37
"The sort of players who would fold a royal flush." Kid Berwyn Sunday #39
Useless VanceFan Sunday #41
Because millions of US citizens are starting to starve? krawhitham Sunday #43
I've seen posts on DU where people seem to have this fantasy that we can keep the government shut down for several more Midwestern Democrat Sunday #45
Excuse me, it's the majority party that shut down Emile Sunday #48
He is a member of the democrat's old guard. republianmushroom Sunday #46
Post removed Post removed Sunday #51
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why Does Schumer Keep Try...»Reply #34