Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

in2herbs

(4,066 posts)

3. The D talking point right now is that they didn't want people to go hungry. Within hours of the Senate vote

Reply to FHRRK (Original post)

Mon Nov 10, 2025, 05:48 AM

Monday

the court ruled that f45 must fund SNAP.

The Ds are telling us to wait on the courts to come to our rescue. They Senate knew this decision was imminent. Why didn't the Ds wait on the court to rule. The court ended up giving us back SNAP, diluting the reason for Ds "caving."

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Do I have this timeline correct? Justice Brown-Jackson [View all] FHRRK Monday OP

It's not going to pass tomorrow. Sogo Monday #1

There has been very little reporting on concessions in the minibus appropriations pat_k Monday #2

The D talking point right now is that they didn't want people to go hungry. Within hours of the Senate vote in2herbs Monday #3