Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

edisdead

(3,396 posts)

20. how is it throwing in the towel?

Reply to CentralMass (Reply #18)

Mon Nov 10, 2025, 12:46 PM

Monday

This is putting the ball in repubs court to do the thing that they were going to do no matter what.

Now they get to come to the table and vote it down or let them expire and there is mo blaming the democrats for shutting down the government.

Gov open or closed this was happening no matter what. Anyone who didn’t know that one year ago today wasn’t paying attention.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

24 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

How would an effective Democratic Senate leader have kept the cavers in line/punish them? [View all] Bobstandard Monday OP

I wouldn't punish anyone SARose Monday #1

There should be consequences Bobstandard Monday #5

what was the shutdown accomplishing at this point? edisdead Monday #19

If there are no consequences... Happy Hoosier Monday #10

They've probably spent the last two weeks deciding which Senators would take the heat when inevitable came. Silent Type Monday #2

Take it as a theoretical question. Try again. nt Bobstandard Monday #7

Schumer is complicit in this. This was throwing in the towel. CentralMass Monday #18

how is it throwing in the towel? edisdead Monday #20

They gave up any leverage that they had. CentralMass Monday #21

what would trump do? "art of the deal" rampartd Monday #3

You could start by stripping committee assignments, then threaten reduced campaign funding Jersey Devil Monday #4

They are either retiring or not running until at least 2028 Kaleva Monday #6

Reread the post and try again. It's a theoretical question. Bobstandard Monday #8

The person I responded to didn't ask a question Kaleva Monday #9

Your post perhaps. The one responded to - Nope. -(nt)- stopdiggin Monday #23

Then the committee assignments come into play Jersey Devil Monday #12

What is the procedure to remove someone from a committee? Kaleva Monday #13

There is no modern precedent for stripping a large group of members, nearly 20% of the caucus, of their committee tritsofme Monday #15

I don't know but Mitch McConnell seemed to have no problems with all of that. BannonsLiver Monday #11

Same way he handled Manchin, Cinema, Fetterman leftstreet Monday #14

Beat them until they cry ... usonian Monday #16

They were doing exactly what Schumer told them JCMach1 Monday #17

you're taking a rather authoritarian line - for your baseline assumption. stopdiggin Monday #22

You are assuming that a majority of Senate Democrats oppose this deal Jose Garcia Monday #24