Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Here we go again... Ocelot II Tuesday #1
I already saw the ending to this movie. Irish_Dem Tuesday #26
Add in 50 year mortgages, and what could go wrong? Nt Fiendish Thingy Tuesday #2
On top of the risk this implies (as you suggest) due to parallels to the 2008 catastrophe AZJonnie Tuesday #3
We're in real trouble when they start handing out second mortgages. Johonny Tuesday #4
Great. Another Dem POTUS will bail out banks leftstreet Tuesday #5
Surprising we're against people with low credit scores getting considered for a mortgage. Silent Type Tuesday #6
I had a low credit score for years and was unable to buy a home. A HERETIC I AM Tuesday #7
"I stopped doing the things that got me the low credit score to begin with." Maru Kitteh Tuesday #18
That's how our credit rating died, in mountains of medical debt. hunter Tuesday #29
Um, folks about to lose their medical insurance! MerryBlooms Tuesday #20
Unfortunately, we all pay when these mortgages go into default Totally Tunsie Tuesday #8
To a libertarian, there's no such thing as a negative externality Prairie Gates Tuesday #13
Because it generally means that the borrower can't afford the loan. hamsterjill Tuesday #10
I recall one of the most infamous tricks of the time: Totally Tunsie Tuesday #15
Surprised you're against protecting them from lenders leftstreet Tuesday #11
The only sacred principle is that all borrowers should have the choice to be exploited Prairie Gates Tuesday #14
All DUrs are against low credit score holders being exploited uponit7771 Tuesday #16
If you consider someone finally getting a house exploitation. I don't. Silent Type Tuesday #17
Someone who can't afford it getting one? Yes ! You know that already and are talking around obvious concerns... uponit7771 Tuesday #19
620 doesn't mean you can't afford it. You deserve an evaluation. This doesn't guarantee a loan, just consideration. Silent Type Tuesday #21
Known known, credit worthiness doesn't express affordability, don't see the point in expressing the obvious? Bottom line uponit7771 Tuesday #23
Trump is proposing to fix serious problems with bandaids. snot Tuesday #31
No question it's bandaids. So was $50K for a down payment. Silent Type Tuesday #32
This is why Grants and Grant City went out of business. QueerDuck Tuesday #9
When these people, go bankrupt or get behind in payment all these corporate companies will snap up the housing kimbutgar Tuesday #12
That doesn't Rebl2 Tuesday #22
Thin credit files shouldn't disqualify otherwise qualified borrowers. flvegan Tuesday #24
Right, no credit can be worse than bad but their earning history kicks in for housing usually. I'm not trusting these .. uponit7771 Tuesday #25
The fear that they'll qualify borrowers they shouldn't flvegan Tuesday #27
I Felt Very Sorry For People Last Time Around OC375 Tuesday #28
I have seen so many young people buy more redstatebluegirl Tuesday #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Fannie Mae to Drop Minimu...»Reply #16