Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Wiz Imp

(8,081 posts)

4. I find this to be a pretty silly argument.

Reply to videohead5 (Original post)

Wed Nov 12, 2025, 06:51 PM

12 hrs ago

If they were capable of destroying the evidence to get rid of the issue, then why haven't they done that already?

And if the answer is, they have done it already, then there is no reason to object to their release.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Quiet Em

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Democrats better start warning Bondi [View all] videohead5 12 hrs ago OP

They almost certainly already have. BlueTsunami2018 12 hrs ago #1

If they have then videohead5 12 hrs ago #2

IF is the word. IF they destroyed the Epstein files... They are trying to hide that they destroyed them. ancianita 11 hrs ago #6

The List! She had the List sitting on her desk. thought crime 8 hrs ago #11

Or what edhopper 12 hrs ago #3

The Democrats will be videohead5 11 hrs ago #5

We hope edhopper 9 hrs ago #9

I find this to be a pretty silly argument. Wiz Imp 12 hrs ago #4

Don't you see? You say... ancianita 11 hrs ago #7

But if they were concerned about breaking that law, they wouldn't do it. Wiz Imp 11 hrs ago #8

If there weren't still "receipts", they wouldn't be working so hard to prevent the discharge petition. yellow dahlia 8 hrs ago #10