Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

BeerBarrelPolka

(2,125 posts)

1. Let me see if I understand this

Reply to AZJonnie (Original post)

Thu Nov 13, 2025, 04:43 AM

Yesterday

"She testified under oath:

She recanted earlier public statements implying Trump was present with girls at Epstein’s."

So she lied at least once. How do we know what the real truth is with her?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Hugin Pompoy Emrys

37 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I'm not sure who (Victim) in the email was, but I think the GQP's claim it was Virginia Guiffre is BS! [View all] AZJonnie Yesterday OP

Let me see if I understand this BeerBarrelPolka Yesterday #1

Fair question! Here's the magical answering machine to the rescue AZJonnie Yesterday #2

Well BeerBarrelPolka Yesterday #3

Anybody but Virginia Guiffre, I would agree AZJonnie Yesterday #4

We will never know definitively BeerBarrelPolka Yesterday #8

For some names, the co-author has knowledge TommyT139 Yesterday #11

This message was self-deleted by its author Volaris Yesterday #29

Did Trump pay her off? mgardener Yesterday #13

Because of the so-called sweetheart deal cobbled together for Epstein... Hugin Yesterday #5

Honestly BeerBarrelPolka Yesterday #6

Sadly, I tend to agree... Hugin Yesterday #9

That's true BeerBarrelPolka Yesterday #10

At least in today's news TommyT139 Yesterday #7

Could have been Katie Johnson jmbar2 Yesterday #12

It would really be nice if she were to come out again Callie1979 Yesterday #15

If she's still living BeerBarrelPolka Yesterday #16

If not it would seem we'd hear about it. She must've had family. Callie1979 Yesterday #21

Good points BeerBarrelPolka Yesterday #22

That case turned out to be extremely sketchy AZJonnie Yesterday #26

Its my understanding that the redaction was done by the Democrats to shield victims. Callie1979 Yesterday #14

There Were Innumerable Other Minors. Virginia Was The Known.... ColoringFool Yesterday #17

Yes, but the subject is this particular email and who (Victim) is in that context AZJonnie Yesterday #31

I'm Saying That Trump Defenders---Not You---Will Try To Use This..... ColoringFool 13 hrs ago #36

Sounds serious Torchlight 9 hrs ago #37

Wasn't Giuffre stationed at Trump's property until Epstein "stole" her? live love laugh Yesterday #18

That's my recollection. Something about her dad working at MALago in allegorical oracle Yesterday #20

Trumps full of it, of course, he didn't care about a towel girl going to work for Epstein AZJonnie Yesterday #30

The GOP released the unredacted document with Giuffre's name Prairie Gates Yesterday #19

Indeed - as the BBC said: muriel_volestrangler Yesterday #23

Hmmmm ... okay thanks for the update. I didn't know if the Democrats knew the name before redaction AZJonnie Yesterday #24

Yes, that's the question others are asking as well Prairie Gates Yesterday #25

Or she didn't testify about her interaction with trump Lifeafter70 Yesterday #27

I addressed that question upthread as it was the first question asked of my OP by BeerBarrelPolka AZJonnie Yesterday #28

I don't think it was about money Lifeafter70 Yesterday #33

I have an idea ... what if it was ALL the money from that suit, that Maxwell settled before actual court? AZJonnie Yesterday #34

I was referring to Virgina Giuffre Lifeafter70 Yesterday #35

Because apparently choie Yesterday #32