Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hugin

(37,117 posts)
5. Because of the so-called sweetheart deal cobbled together for Epstein...
Thu Nov 13, 2025, 05:48 AM
13 hrs ago

Which we've since learned somehow for some reason and very unusually contained a rider allegedly barring the investigation/prosecution of other parties/accomplices. It's probably safe to assume that the testimony was massaged to support the charge Epstein acted alone. So, your caution in the interpretation of anything public drawn from that is a good idea.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Let me see if I understand this BeerBarrelPolka 14 hrs ago #1
Fair question! Here's the magical answering machine to the rescue AZJonnie 13 hrs ago #2
Well BeerBarrelPolka 13 hrs ago #3
Anybody but Virginia Guiffre, I would agree AZJonnie 13 hrs ago #4
We will never know definitively BeerBarrelPolka 12 hrs ago #8
For some names, the co-author has knowledge TommyT139 12 hrs ago #11
This message was self-deleted by its author Volaris 5 hrs ago #29
Did Trump pay her off? mgardener 12 hrs ago #13
Because of the so-called sweetheart deal cobbled together for Epstein... Hugin 13 hrs ago #5
Honestly BeerBarrelPolka 12 hrs ago #6
Sadly, I tend to agree... Hugin 12 hrs ago #9
That's true BeerBarrelPolka 12 hrs ago #10
At least in today's news TommyT139 12 hrs ago #7
Could have been Katie Johnson jmbar2 12 hrs ago #12
It would really be nice if she were to come out again Callie1979 11 hrs ago #15
If she's still living BeerBarrelPolka 11 hrs ago #16
If not it would seem we'd hear about it. She must've had family. Callie1979 10 hrs ago #21
Good points BeerBarrelPolka 10 hrs ago #22
That case turned out to be extremely sketchy AZJonnie 5 hrs ago #26
Its my understanding that the redaction was done by the Democrats to shield victims. Callie1979 11 hrs ago #14
There Were Innumerable Other Minors. Virginia Was The Known.... ColoringFool 11 hrs ago #17
Yes, but the subject is this particular email and who (Victim) is in that context AZJonnie 4 hrs ago #31
Wasn't Giuffre stationed at Trump's property until Epstein "stole" her? live love laugh 11 hrs ago #18
That's my recollection. Something about her dad working at MALago in allegorical oracle 10 hrs ago #20
Trumps full of it, of course, he didn't care about a towel girl going to work for Epstein AZJonnie 4 hrs ago #30
The GOP released the unredacted document with Giuffre's name Prairie Gates 11 hrs ago #19
Indeed - as the BBC said: muriel_volestrangler 9 hrs ago #23
Hmmmm ... okay thanks for the update. I didn't know if the Democrats knew the name before redaction AZJonnie 5 hrs ago #24
Yes, that's the question others are asking as well Prairie Gates 5 hrs ago #25
Or she didn't testify about her interaction with trump Lifeafter70 5 hrs ago #27
I addressed that question upthread as it was the first question asked of my OP by BeerBarrelPolka AZJonnie 5 hrs ago #28
I don't think it was about money Lifeafter70 4 hrs ago #33
I have an idea ... what if it was ALL the money from that suit, that Maxwell settled before actual court? AZJonnie 2 hrs ago #34
I was referring to Virgina Giuffre Lifeafter70 1 hr ago #35
Because apparently choie 4 hrs ago #32
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I'm not sure who (Victim)...»Reply #5