Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jfz9580m

(16,148 posts)
15. That's true often with a caveat though
Thu Nov 13, 2025, 11:07 PM
Thursday

One reason I think Current Affairs for instance is a consistently excellent magazine in how clearly and concisely they get it right wrt parsing things to decimate any logical loopholes, like Alex Skopic’s latest piece:

There’s a popular line of thinking, embodied in David Hogg’s “Leaders We Deserve” PAC and Samuel Moyn’s forthcoming book Gerontocracy in America, that says elderly, out-of-touch leaders like Chuck Grassley are behind a lot of the country’s problems.
In general, age is a bad proxy for policy preferences, class allegiance, and even competence. The presumption behind the “gerontocracy” narrative is that younger equals more progressive, more worker-friendly, and that’s statistically likely, but not always true in individual cases.


(They are pretty much my favorite publication. I am careful posting them here though since they do bash Democrats a lot, although from the left. I generally agree with them on most things except China. I find China terrifying. And it’s not quite the reason, but I got a window into a type of worldview with Liu Cixin who I think has a very ugly view of what survival means. It’s ruthlessly crass and some of it I think is owed to the worldview of that state).

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I listened to Indivisible...»Reply #15