Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

groundloop

(13,190 posts)
Mon Jul 28, 2025, 01:39 PM Jul 28

Ghislaine Maxwell makes pitch to Supreme Court [View all]

Source: ABC News

The U.S. Supreme Court should hear Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal of her 2021 sex trafficking conviction because the government has an "obligation to honor" a non-prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein that inoculated Maxwell from any criminal charges, her lawyers argued in a brief to the Supreme Court Monday.

"Plea and non-prosecution agreements resolve nearly every federal case. They routinely include promises that extend to others—co-conspirators, family members, potential witnesses. If those promises mean different things in different parts of the country, then trust in our system collapses," the brief said.

Federal prosecutors have argued that the non-prosecution agreement applied only in Florida and did not bind New York, where charges against him, and subsequently Maxwell, were brought.

"It is not geographically limited to the Southern District of Florida, it is not conditioned on the co-conspirators being known by the government at the time, it does not depend on what any particular government attorney may have had in his or her head about who might be a co-conspirator, and it contains no other caveat or exception. This should be the end of the discussion," the defense brief said.

Read more: https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/ghislaine-maxwell-makes-pitch-supreme-court/story?id=124144128

23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Go ahead John Roberts, I triple-dog-dare you... Fiendish Thingy Jul 28 #1
You often have clever readings of the Court Prairie Gates Jul 28 #5
Sure, that's a possibility Fiendish Thingy Jul 28 #6
They will rule Miguelito Loveless Jul 28 #19
The argument on jurisdictional specificity has some merit on its face; whether an agreement with Epstein Prairie Gates Jul 28 #2
She wasn't named or charged during the original case IbogaProject Jul 28 #3
This court STALLS on everything against TSF, BUT THIS could help him, so i'm thinkiong THIS is their plan bluestarone Jul 28 #4
I dunno. Even 'Pucker Up And Kiss Trump's Ass' Chief Justice might balk at allowing THIS can of worms into the building Attilatheblond Jul 28 #9
A convenient way to avoid pardoning or commuting her tishaLA Jul 28 #7
Yup, the SC could tidy this all up - nice and neatly - and once again, Trump escapes accountability. Marie Marie Jul 28 #20
IMHO and I am not an attorney UpInArms Jul 28 #8
But she's white and rich, so she thinks she's getting out Attilatheblond Jul 28 #11
See post #16. onenote Jul 28 #17
This is silly. Jacson6 Jul 28 #10
Holder of the evidence has magical powers Attilatheblond Jul 28 #12
The plea deal was broadly worded and she falls within its scope. onenote Jul 28 #16
I think the opposite here. bluestarone Jul 28 #18
Did Epstein ACUALLY FULFILL ALL the terms 3825-87867 Jul 28 #21
Yes. It was a sweetheart deal. Didn't require that much. onenote Jul 28 #22
It all depends on what she knows about certain of the "Men in Black Nightgowns" usonian Jul 28 #13
drumpf always gets others to do his dirty work for him JoseBalow Jul 28 #14
The dirty half-dozen will accept this bullshit so Trump doesn't have to pardon her hadEnuf Jul 28 #15
This whole scenario is disgusting mdbl Jul 28 #23
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Ghislaine Maxwell makes p...