Latest Breaking News

bluestarone

(20,008 posts)

34. Don't know, maybe some of these judges

Reply to SidneyR (Reply #25)

Thu Jul 31, 2025, 08:40 PM

Thursday

are in some of the VIDEO's? Hell, who knows anymore.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

46 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court sets date to consider whether to review Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal [View all] LetMyPeopleVote Wednesday OP

Normal Smilo Wednesday #1

Convenient? It's simply the date of the first scheduling conference of the fall SCOTUS term onenote Thursday #23

What??? chelsea0011 Wednesday #2

She filed a petition for certiorari raising a legal issue. onenote Wednesday #5

You know.... Like they do. PuraVidaDreamin Thursday #26

The fact you don't understand standard court procedure doesn't make it a conspiracy. onenote Thursday #29

We shall see PuraVidaDreamin 19 hrs ago #44

NOTHING is normal with this fucking court bluestarone Wednesday #3

All that is being considered is a petition for certiorari. SOP onenote Wednesday #6

Isn't This Caused By The Recent Supreme Court Ruling DallasNE Wednesday #15

No. onenote Wednesday #16

This guarantees the story will continue to have legs 303squadron Wednesday #4

Just for the record, WHO decided? bluestarone Wednesday #7

The shadow docket knows.............. turbinetree Wednesday #8

This isn't a shadow docket case. Its a run of the mill petition for certiorari -- onenote Wednesday #10

Thanks............. turbinetree Wednesday #14

Nothing was decided. It was a standard administrative move scheduling the conference at which the petition onenote Wednesday #9

Your right, i do nopt understand how Supreme court works, BUT bluestarone Wednesday #11

No. A decision on whether to hear her case won't be made until September when the court considers her petition onenote Wednesday #12

TYVM! I always thought before any decision a judge had to decide to hear a case. bluestarone Wednesday #13

So repubs want to have Hornedfrog2000 Thursday #17

Not what the case is about. And the administration has opposed her petition for cert. onenote Thursday #19

How does Jughead Thursday #18

Average Americans file petitions for cert all the time. Around 8000 to 10,000 per year. onenote Thursday #20

Sorry, but i'm still confused, by this comment, "the rest are denied" bluestarone Thursday #27

The court -- assisted by their clerks -- reviews the petitions and if at least four justices deem a petition cert-worthy onenote Thursday #30

Ok, so four SC justices reviewed this? (with their clerks) bluestarone Thursday #32

No. Ms. Toad Thursday #39

I'm not asking question to argue with you, but rather trying to understand exactly their process. So my final questions bluestarone 15 hrs ago #45

At the scheduling conference all nine justices consider each pending petition for cert. onenote 11 hrs ago #46

Would you further explain. . . UniqueUserName Thursday #28

I don't know if it merits being one that will be granted. We won't know if it is or isn't granted until early October onenote Thursday #31

Sorry but again i'm saying bluestarone Thursday #33

No - Ms. Toad Thursday #38

No it couldn't. onenote Thursday #40

Thanks for doing the heavy lifting here. n/t Ms. Toad Thursday #41

Thanks. I'm actually a member of the supreme court bar and have participated -- but not argued -- onenote Thursday #42

I hit a couple of threads on it yesterday or the day before. Ms. Toad Thursday #43

It has NOT been granted. Ms. Toad Thursday #37

My brother, Ms. Toad Thursday #35

I wonder if any of the Supremes have visited any Epstein properties? 70sEraVet Thursday #21

The appropriate parties will be paid dlk Thursday #22

G O P stands for MW67 Thursday #24

Elites get to have their case go to the Supreme Court. SidneyR Thursday #25

Don't know, maybe some of these judges bluestarone Thursday #34

First - the court has NOT yet decided to hear her case. Ms. Toad Thursday #36