Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(158,685 posts)
31. Believe it or not
Sun Aug 3, 2025, 05:17 PM
Aug 3
even GOP-appointed judges are putting off retiring because of what is happening. (link from a couple weeks ago)

The Atlantic just had a piece on this yesterday -

Republicans Might Regret Putting Emil Bove on the Bench

By Brendan Ballou
August 2, 2025, 8 AM ET

(snip)

Since he first took office, in 2017, Trump has maintained the support of Senate Republicans in part through a simple bargain: They put up with his obvious unfitness for office, and in exchange, he appoints reliably conservative judges to the federal courts. But by appointing Bove—whose only apparent loyalty is to his own ambition, not to any particular legal philosophy—the GOP might have limited its own ability to appoint judges in the future. This is because the president typically gets to appoint new judges only when old ones die, retire, or move into the quasi-retirement position of “senior status.” And some judges, even conservative ones who would otherwise be happy to let a Republican president pick their replacement, are likely to delay their retirement rather than hand Trump the opportunity to make more Bove-style appointments.

The evidence suggests that this is already happening. Many federal judges time their retirement based on which party is in power: Democrat-appointed judges are likelier to retire when a Democrat is president, Republican-appointed judges when a Republican is. So far through Trump’s second term, however, conservative judges aren’t retiring at the pace they typically do. An analysis by Bloomberg Law found that 26 judicial seats opened up from the beginning of the year through the first five months of Trump’s first term, as did 57 judicial seats during the same period of Joe Biden’s presidency. By contrast, through June 1 of his second term, Trump gained just 16 vacancies to fill. Ursula Ungaro, a retired judge appointed by George W. Bush, told Bloomberg Law that she’d heard a “hint or two” that her former peers “would stay beyond their eligibility for senior status to see what happens toward the end of the Trump administration.”

(snip)

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Less than a week to start provoking a backlash. calimary Aug 3 #1
Nothing will be done Dr. Shepper Aug 3 #2
Looks like a few people agree with you NJCher Aug 3 #3
Despite all the negatives on this guy, he gets a lifetime appointment. Katinfl Aug 3 #4
Isn't impeachment... GiqueCee Aug 3 #5
I forgot about impeachment for Bove. Yes, that would be an option. Katinfl Aug 3 #6
It's a fantasy, considering you need 67 votes in the Senate Polybius Aug 3 #21
The only way that would happen is if the Dems are in the majority. Katinfl Aug 3 #24
If the Dems are in the majority... GiqueCee Aug 3 #26
That takes a majority in the House COL Mustard Aug 3 #7
That's why I said, "For now." GiqueCee Aug 3 #8
Stay optimistic, my friend. COL Mustard Aug 3 #15
Not gonna happen Polybius Aug 3 #20
Trump has shit on the plate of so many people Dan Aug 3 #17
I appreciate your optimism and I truly hope you are correct. Katinfl Aug 3 #23
He wasn't put in office by "decent people in America" maxsolomon Aug 4 #35
You mentioned death? I am sure folks will dance in the streets if that happens. Trueblue1968 Aug 3 #22
An honest question PJMcK Aug 3 #9
The 3rd Circuit has 14 "active" (non-senior) judges BumRushDaShow Aug 3 #11
He's 1 of 14 TommyT139 Aug 3 #29
Believe it or not BumRushDaShow Aug 3 #31
We are not giving up. thought crime Aug 3 #16
No one said give up Miguelito Loveless Aug 4 #36
re: "Nothing will be done" -- Something IS being done, that's the point of the article. thesquanderer Aug 3 #14
it seems like there's a universal law NJCher Aug 3 #19
That's wishful thinking I'm afraid. FBaggins Aug 3 #32
Negate Trump. All else is secondary. Then move on. tirebiter Aug 3 #10
Where is that one poster who says "they cant do that"? Hornedfrog2000 Aug 3 #12
Say F-you to his judicial orders? 2na fisherman Aug 3 #13
The Trump kakistocracy continues to grow Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Aug 3 #18
What Ballou says makes no sense to this layman. What possible form could a "legal system backlash" take, anyway. ancianita Aug 3 #25
I have always posted BumRushDaShow Aug 3 #27
And as Americans we have always believed that. ancianita Aug 3 #28
Shouldnt he be removed from the legal profession Progressive dog Aug 3 #30
As some have noted, impeachment isn't very likely, at least not in the foreseeable future. ShazzieB Aug 3 #33
Am thinking that so much shit is breaking that somethings gotta give... All is not lost. Battle on tazcat Aug 3 #34
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»'Come to regret': Federal...»Reply #31