Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Wiz Imp

(6,663 posts)
27. More info on Acosta that never seems to get reported
Thu Aug 7, 2025, 10:24 AM
Aug 7
https://katherineclark.house.gov/2019/7/salon-after-giving-epstein-deal-of-a-lifetime-alex-acosta-tried-to-slash-anti-trafficking-program
Acosta’s Labor Department budget proposal for fiscal year 2020 proposed slashing the budget of the International Labor Affairs Bureau (ILAB) by nearly 80 percent. The agency is charged with combating human trafficking, child labor and forced labor in the United States and around the world.

After Clark and Acosta both agreed that more needed to be done to combat trafficking, Clark pointed out that Acosta had also “proposed a budget cut, almost 80 percent, 79 percent to ILAB where this work is done, bringing its budget from $68 million to just $18.5 million.”

“I’m sure you’ve come prepared to justify this cut to us but it doesn’t go unnoticed that this isn’t the first time that you’ve ignored human trafficking,” Clark said. “Your office found that there had been a sexual abuse pyramid scheme that involved at least 36 underage girls. … Mr. Epstein raped and recruited these girls … and there is evidence that he allowed his friends to do the same.”

“Epstein should have been looking at a sentence of 366 years at a minimum. But that’s not what happened,” Clark continued. “How can we expect you, the labor secretary, to fight for American workers if you couldn't even fight for these girls?”


https://katherineclark.house.gov/2019/4/washington-post-acosta-confronted-by-lawmakers-over-plea-deal-in-jeffrey-epstein-sexual-misconduct-case#:~:text=Acosta%20responded%20that%20human%20trafficking,and%20the%20victims%20received%20restitution.%E2%80%9D

“This isn’t the first time you have ignored human trafficking,” Clark said. “If you as U.S. attorney could not fight for these girls, how, as secretary of labor, can you tell this panel and the American people that you can responsibly oversee this budget [and] the Department of Labor, including human trafficking?”

“Epstein was incarcerated,” Acosta said. “He registered as a sex offender. The world was put on notice that he was a sex offender, and the victims received restitution.”

“I understand the frustration,” he said. “I think it’s important for people to know he was going to get off with no jail time or restitution. It was the work of our office that resulted in him going to jail. It was the work of our office that resulted in him having to register as a sex offender.”


In March, The Washington Post reported that, although Epstein’s alleged victims were as young as 14, the only minor he was convicted of soliciting was 16 when the offenses began. The decision to charge Epstein with a crime involving an older teen has eased his obligations to register as a sex offender. For example, Epstein does not have to register in New Mexico, where he owns a ranch, because his victim was not under 16.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/jeffrey-epsteins-sick-story-played-out-for-years-in-plain-sight/

A couple of years ago, I was interviewing a former senior White House official when the name Jeffrey Epstein came up.

Unaware of my personal history with Epstein, this person assured me that the New York financier was no serious harm to anyone. He was a good guy. A charming guy. Useful, too. He knew a lot of rich Arabs, including the crown prince of Saudi Arabia, and, further, he had clever ideas about creating bond issues for them. “OK, so he has a girl problem,” this person threw on, almost as an afterthought.

Epstein’s name, I was told, had been raised by the Trump transition team when Alexander Acosta, the former U.S. attorney in Miami who’d infamously cut Epstein a non-prosecution plea deal back in 2007, was being interviewed for the job of labor secretary. The plea deal put a hard stop to a separate federal investigation of alleged sex crimes with minors and trafficking.

“Is the Epstein case going to cause a problem [for confirmation hearings]?” Acosta had been asked. Acosta had explained, breezily, apparently, that back in the day he’d had just one meeting on the Epstein case. He’d cut the non-prosecution deal with one of Epstein’s attorneys because he had “been told” to back off, that Epstein was above his pay grade. “I was told Epstein ‘belonged to intelligence’ and to leave it alone,” he told his interviewers in the Trump transition, who evidently thought that was a sufficient answer and went ahead and hired Acosta. (The Labor Department had no comment when asked about this.)

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

House of clowns. Fucking ridiculous. Karasu Aug 7 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author Scott Alan Swaggerty Aug 7 #23
Very odd Scott Alan Swaggerty Aug 7 #2
Why is it "odd"? BumRushDaShow Aug 7 #3
Odd... *wink* Scott Alan Swaggerty Aug 7 #17
I'd say it's more like VERY corrupt. Prof. Toru Tanaka Aug 7 #15
Well yes, could say that too. It is very corrupt. Scott Alan Swaggerty Aug 7 #16
The end of the article makes this even more infuriating. ariadne0614 Aug 7 #4
So why isn't the media hounding this dude with questions? Chasstev365 Aug 7 #5
Maybe because Magats have him holed up in an undisclosed safe house? gab13by13 Aug 7 #6
I just looked it up: Chasstev365 Aug 7 #7
Unbelievable, gab13by13 Aug 7 #9
Here is the link Chasstev365 Aug 7 #10
This message was self-deleted by its author Scott Alan Swaggerty Aug 7 #24
Right?! Scott Alan Swaggerty Aug 7 #21
This message was self-deleted by its author Scott Alan Swaggerty Aug 7 #22
Wasn't Robert Garcia just elected by House Democrats to gab13by13 Aug 7 #8
Here is the webpage for the The House Committee on Oversight and Accountability Democrats Press Releases BumRushDaShow Aug 7 #11
Good rundown Scott Alan Swaggerty Aug 7 #20
This message was self-deleted by its author Scott Alan Swaggerty Aug 7 #25
I think the House Oversight Committee should summer in California orchards Torchlight Aug 7 #12
Heh, indeed Scott Alan Swaggerty Aug 7 #19
Alex Acosta was told to lay off the case against Jeffrey Epstein FakeNoose Aug 7 #13
And who was the Attorney General during this time? BumRushDaShow Aug 7 #14
Who exactly told him to lay off and when? Funny how he never said those, right? Scott Alan Swaggerty Aug 7 #18
I don't think Julie K. Brown was ever told "who" gave Acosta the message FakeNoose Aug 7 #26
More info on Acosta that never seems to get reported Wiz Imp Aug 7 #27
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Congress doesn't want to ...»Reply #27