Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
19. No Roberts without Rehnquist 5
Wed Aug 20, 2025, 01:02 PM
Aug 20

I certainly agree with everything you said but there would now be no Roberts court now if the Rehnquist 5 hadn't shredded the U.S. constitution to stop the legal Florida vote count and install W against the will of the people.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

He's not leading a movement Puppyjive Aug 19 #1
States control how they run elections, not some pompous ass in the white house lostincalifornia Aug 19 #2
If only that had been true in 2000 ClimateChangeisReal Aug 19 #8
Not entirely. Gore's defense team messed up. They should have asked for a recount for the whole state instead of lostincalifornia Aug 19 #15
Florida election law in 2000 ClimateChangeisReal Aug 20 #18
Who Would Have Thought Trump Would Release The JFK Files Before Evidence of 2020 Fraud? DrFunkenstein Aug 19 #3
Post removed Post removed Aug 19 #4
Only if you want to believe that and not read what he actually said ancianita Aug 19 #5
It's a tragedy for our country ClimateChangeisReal Aug 19 #9
It is, indeed. We have the Pirate John Roberts to thank for that. ancianita Aug 19 #13
No Roberts without Rehnquist 5 ClimateChangeisReal Aug 20 #19
Pretty sure he'd have been before the court either way. Rehnquist liberals were persuadable. ancianita Aug 20 #20
Al Gore would never have appointed Roberts ClimateChangeisReal Thursday #25
Of course not. That's exactly why Bush rewarded him and made him chief justice. ancianita Thursday #26
My original point still stands ClimateChangeisReal Friday #28
So be it. Your original point, however, ignores the reality of Roberts persuading the Rehnquist 5. ancianita Friday #29
Scalia's ruling made it clear what Rehnquist 5 were doing ClimateChangeisReal Saturday #30
Who's going to tell the Fascist Felon... Dulcinea Aug 19 #6
If only voting had been a state matter in 2000 ClimateChangeisReal Aug 19 #10
If he really wants to get rid of voting machines KS Toronado Aug 19 #7
And it'll take weeks to get the final results BumRushDaShow Aug 19 #11
Just like the Epstien files you'd NEVER see the paper trail. Case closed,Trump won Bengus81 Aug 19 #12
MaddowBlog-Trump's crusade against mail-in ballots isn't doing Republicans any favors LetMyPeopleVote Aug 19 #14
Schumer?! Wait what? LuvLoogie Aug 19 #16
His goons will be at the polls orangecrush Aug 19 #17
Like anybody pays attention to Schumer anyway. RealityChik Aug 20 #21
I and People I know "Pay Attention" to Sen Schumer. Cha Aug 20 #22
The person is having a very rough day, as DU REALITY becomes apparent progree Aug 20 #23
Yes, I see Cha Aug 20 #24
Chuck Schumer lost the perfect opportunity to tell everyone that Chump ALWAYS votes by MAIL FakeNoose Thursday #27
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Schumer Rips Trump's Bid ...»Reply #19