Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(160,895 posts)
24. You need to become a CSPAN junkie to see how they operate in Congress
Mon Sep 29, 2025, 09:47 PM
12 hrs ago

At the start of every 2-year Congressional session, "leaders" are chosen as well as either "Chairs" (for the party in the majority) or "Ranking Members" (if the party is in the minority) for all the Committees. It can be a fierce battle as you might have noted with some of the Ranking Member slots like for the House Oversight Committee and House Judiciary Committees.

Democrats CHOSE Schumer after we lost the Senate in 2024 as he had been the Majority Leader before then (since 2020). Prior to 2020, Democrats were last in control of the Senate in 2013, where Harry Reid was the Majority Leader. We then lost the Senate in the 2014 election and didn't regain it until 2020 (barely as it was a tie but swung to (D) due to having the Presidency and Vice-Presidency where the VP is technically "the President of the Senate" and can break ties). At that time, Schumer was the Democratic Caucus Vice-Chair (and Dick Durbin was the Assistant Majority Leader to Reid), and Schumer ran and won the top leadership job.

So from that era, the Caucus had a record of his work in a leadership position. I know that Durbin decided to remain as a Whip vs running for Minority Leader.

ETA and IMHO - Schumer was fine for the "past" but we are in a "break glass" moment, where all bets are off and a different style/tactic is needed (i.e., I get what you are saying but they are not going to completely toss out protocol now but should we make it to the 2026 election, he'll be toast).

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

He already knew that he was going to harm over 17 million people with health care he doesn't give a shit............ turbinetree 14 hrs ago #1
I believe the funding cuts had to do with Medicaid, not Medicare, and not renewing the subsidies lostincalifornia 14 hrs ago #4
Starting Jan 1st subsidies will go up around 50 to 100 percent, this will be the death of ACA which the fascists want.nt ImNotGod 13 hrs ago #12
absolutely. It is the most mean, immoral, attack against the most vulnerable people in our country. lostincalifornia 13 hrs ago #14
correct, and that will eventually increase healthcare costs for EVERYONE Skittles 12 hrs ago #32
Medicare is going to a new managed care model in 6 states in 2026. Irish_Dem 12 hrs ago #21
Aarp should be screaming about this flamingdem 12 hrs ago #23
Yes, no one seems to care. Irish_Dem 12 hrs ago #25
The seniors have been out there protesting flamingdem 11 hrs ago #39
I hope people complain. Irish_Dem 5 hrs ago #42
How the hell are they doing that? pat_k 12 hrs ago #30
If you are living in one of the six states, they are going to do it. Irish_Dem 12 hrs ago #31
I poked around. It is a CMS "experiment" to root out nonexistent "waste/fraud/abuse" pat_k 11 hrs ago #37
Found more: pat_k 11 hrs ago #38
Medicaid not Medicare and the way I understand it is that the cuts are so horrible Bengus81 1 hr ago #46
Kudos to Sen. Schumer mcar 14 hrs ago #2
I'll give him points if he holds firm Skittles 12 hrs ago #34
Why that can't be, I read here on DU that Sen. Schumer and Rep. Jeffries were getting ready to cave. MarineCombatEngineer 14 hrs ago #3
Not the first time.. Cha 14 hrs ago #7
Nor the last. sheshe2 13 hrs ago #9
Not at this rate. Cha 13 hrs ago #10
but they quoted "anonymous sources". lostincalifornia 13 hrs ago #15
Oh, well then, it must be true, MarineCombatEngineer 12 hrs ago #19
Keep pressuring Schumer. Justice Brandeis 14 hrs ago #5
Maybe all those messages helped. ananda 14 hrs ago #6
Am I missing something? He's only one person. Why can't the rest of the Dems vote their conscience? Baitball Blogger 13 hrs ago #8
The House can easily pass the ridiculous C.R. because they will have the majority (which is needed for passage) BumRushDaShow 13 hrs ago #11
Yep, MarineCombatEngineer 13 hrs ago #13
My point is, if Shumer can't lead, why do the other senators have to listen to him? Baitball Blogger 13 hrs ago #16
I understand your and others' concern about his (lack of) "leadership" skills BumRushDaShow 13 hrs ago #17
Basic protocol is what gave us our weak hand. Baitball Blogger 13 hrs ago #18
You need to become a CSPAN junkie to see how they operate in Congress BumRushDaShow 12 hrs ago #24
The sad part is that Karma13612 3 hrs ago #44
CSPAN does have a YouTube channel BumRushDaShow 33 min ago #48
Or... and hear me out... OldBaldy1701E 1 hr ago #45
What you see today BumRushDaShow 29 min ago #49
"the president, who was really listening to us" BWdem4life 12 hrs ago #20
Hurting people in any form is exactly what psychopaths live for. ... littlemissmartypants 12 hrs ago #22
Apparently he played dumb about what was going to happen. Klarkashton 12 hrs ago #27
He who played dumb? littlemissmartypants 12 hrs ago #33
The elections are far off. Put the fucking heat on those Klarkashton 12 hrs ago #26
So, is the only "red line" ACA enhanced subsidies? pat_k 12 hrs ago #28
I think Medicaid cuts were also part of that. BumRushDaShow 12 hrs ago #29
Kick and Recommend! sheshe2 11 hrs ago #35
Good. Ten days is a brief headline-dimming distraction DFW 11 hrs ago #36
A great way to keep up with developments in ACA tonekat 10 hrs ago #40
I hope that Schumer and Jeffries hold firm. Bread and Circuses 10 hrs ago #41
At the very least, Jeffries and Schumer are on the record for warning TSF no_hypocrisy 4 hrs ago #43
He's going to have to stay strong JustAnotherGen 1 hr ago #47
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Schumer says he will not ...»Reply #24