Latest Breaking News

NotHardly

(2,226 posts)

12. The word "Nuremburg" means nothing to them...

Wed Nov 12, 2025, 05:42 PM

9 hrs ago

Imagine how surprised they will be that it works as well as Hitler telling his Nazis they'll be OK if they are ever tried for war crimes.

NOTE: On October 1, 1946, the verdicts on 22 of the original 24 defendants were handed down for the Nuremberg trials. Three of the defendants were acquitted. Four were convicted and sentenced to terms of imprisonment ranging from 10 to 20 years. Three were sentenced to life imprisonment. Twelve of the defendants were sentenced to death by hanging.

2nd Note: Twelve of the Nuremberg defendants were sentenced to death by hanging. Ten of them—Hans Frank, Wilhelm Frick, Julius Streicher, Alfred Rosenberg, Ernst Kaltenbrunner, Joachim von Ribbentrop, Fritz Sauckel, Alfred Jodl, Wilhelm Keitel, and Arthur Seyss-Inquart—were hanged on October 16, 1946. Martin Bormann was tried and condemned to death in absentia, and Hermann Göring committed suicide by swallowing a cyanide capsule before he could be executed.

Two notes were edited for clarification & details.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Justice matters.wolfie001 spudspud

32 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

U.S. troops not liable in boat strikes, classified Justice Dept. memo says [View all] BumRushDaShow 11 hrs ago OP

shithole and the Pentagon are......................... Lovie777 11 hrs ago #1

The word "Nuremburg" means nothing to them... NotHardly 9 hrs ago #12

He's got that immunity Polybius 7 hrs ago #20

That's what Hitler told his gestapo. Irish_Dem 11 hrs ago #2

If they have immunity for the killing, do they have immunity for complying with the orders to kill? And, if they have in2herbs 11 hrs ago #3

Making it legal don't make it right. twodogsbarking 11 hrs ago #4

It would be a law "more honored in the breach than the observance" ananda 11 hrs ago #6

Sounds like you could be contract lawyer. One that is an expert in contracts, not a temp hire. twodogsbarking 11 hrs ago #7

I guess an old English teacher will have to do. ananda 11 hrs ago #8

Reading and interpreting. twodogsbarking 9 hrs ago #15

International Criminal Court 2na fisherman 11 hrs ago #5

They are powerless here though Polybius 7 hrs ago #21

Maybe not while you guiys are in control. BUT bluestarone 11 hrs ago #9

Remember Anwar Nasser Abdulla al-Awlaki? He was a native-born US citizen killed by a drone strike on September 30, 2011, 24601 10 hrs ago #10

Comparing the al-Awlaki case to these continuing attacks on boats is quite the stretch Prairie Gates 9 hrs ago #14

Anything can be challenged, and should be. Wtf. nt miyazaki 10 hrs ago #11

An incorrect and meaningless legal opinion. TomSlick 9 hrs ago #13

They will probably try to hold it to the same level BumRushDaShow 8 hrs ago #19

Perhaps. TomSlick 7 hrs ago #23

... Solly Mack 9 hrs ago #16

How convenient.... Quanto Magnus 8 hrs ago #17

Just following orders. Right? n/t Munu 8 hrs ago #18

Probably kevinore 7 hrs ago #22

Nuremberg NewEnglandAutumn 6 hrs ago #24

John Yoo and Alberto Gonzalez come to mind. Buddyzbuddy 6 hrs ago #25

Somebody probably told the Gestapo and the SS the same thing. Turbineguy 6 hrs ago #26

The international courts may disagree as will American courts JT45242 6 hrs ago #27

John Yoo also wrote an opinion claiming water boarding was not torture. surfered 5 hrs ago #28

So..... COL Mustard 5 hrs ago #29

Says you. kacekwl 5 hrs ago #30

Didn't a number of German officers and soldiers try the defence that they were just following orders? cstanleytech 2 hrs ago #31

America has an unortunate track record on extra judicial killings. Aussie105 37 sec ago #32