Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
So what has Project 2025 dismantled and destroyed?
Read its four pillars and you'll know which ones they are.
We've done nothing but talk about these destructions since Jan 20, the felon's inauguration day.
Project 2025's supporters say it will dismantle a government bureaucracy that is, they believe, unaccountable and biased toward liberalism.[8] Its critics have called it authoritarian, Christian nationalist,[9][10] and autocratic.[12]
Legal experts say it would undermine the rule of law,[13] the separation of powers,[5] the separation of church and state,[14][12] and civil liberties.[5][13][15]
Some critics have suggested Project 2025 is based on personal vengeance, or that its proposals for national conservatism are merely an "attempt to intellectually retrofit a rationale for Trumpism".[8]
Compared to previous Republican agendas, Project 2025 contains more elements of culture war and advocates for wider implementation of policy across the federal government.[117]
While some proposals might require the support of Republicans in Congress[8] or favorable rulings from the Supreme Court, much relies on executive authority.[citation needed]
Legal experts say it would undermine the rule of law,[13] the separation of powers,[5] the separation of church and state,[14][12] and civil liberties.[5][13][15]
Some critics have suggested Project 2025 is based on personal vengeance, or that its proposals for national conservatism are merely an "attempt to intellectually retrofit a rationale for Trumpism".[8]
Compared to previous Republican agendas, Project 2025 contains more elements of culture war and advocates for wider implementation of policy across the federal government.[117]
While some proposals might require the support of Republicans in Congress[8] or favorable rulings from the Supreme Court, much relies on executive authority.[citation needed]
Hope that helps.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
18 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read